« My desk, right now | Main | "We need to support it. We need to buy it. We need to tell the companies that we appreciate it." »
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451d49569e200d8350ecfc169e2
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Something for the Planners:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Thanks.
Although I'm a bit shamfaced about being a planner today.
Posted by: beeker | Jan 18, 2007 at 13:23
Why?
Posted by: Ben | Jan 18, 2007 at 13:34
Thanks for that, i'll try and post a design treat soon in return.
Beeker, would this be because of THAT post?
Posted by: Rob Mortimer | Jan 18, 2007 at 14:05
"THAT" post? Do tell.
Posted by: Ben | Jan 18, 2007 at 14:31
http://www.adliterate.com/archives/2007/01/is_blogging_kil_1.html
Heated debate!
Posted by: Rob Mortimer | Jan 18, 2007 at 14:47
Might be. Should never got involved. And come to think of it I'm more shamefaced than shamfaced. Although shamfaced is quite interesting.
Posted by: beeker | Jan 18, 2007 at 14:54
I'm glad I posted these pictures now. Cheered you all up a bit, I'm sure.
Posted by: Ben | Jan 18, 2007 at 14:57
Shamfaced, is that Irish or Cockney Geezer?
Thanks Ben, they reaffirmed blogging as a Planners friend ;)
Posted by: Rob Mortimer | Jan 18, 2007 at 15:10
Shamfaced as I see it is more like having a sham for a face.
Where did you take them Ben? They have cheered me up a bit actually.
Posted by: beeker | Jan 18, 2007 at 16:47
Beeker - I spotted it at the Dali Museum (which is rubbish). Apparently Dali liked complexity and hated simplicity.
Don't think he was a planner.
Posted by: Ben | Jan 19, 2007 at 09:54
Maybe it was a hobby?
Posted by: beeker | Jan 19, 2007 at 12:42