yIt's a well known fact that I don't like the Guardian redesign.
I still don't like it and in fact I like it less and less. There aren't enough columns and David Hillman doesn't like it either.
Still, as people keep pointing out to me, it won a D&AD Black Pencil - so what do I know?
Last year I met someone who used to work at The Guardian and this post the other day reminded me of a little tale.
One of the things that annoys me most about The Guardian is the size. It's neither tabloid like The Independent or The Times or a full broadsheet like The Telegraph. Apparently when they were working on the redesign, the editor used to have a presentation where he explained why they didn't go tabloid.
He took the front page of the tabloid Indy and the tabloid Daily Mail and swapped them around. Then he asked people which one was which.
So, let's play a little game.
Question A: Is this an Independent front page or a Daily Mail front page?
You see, he's got a point hasn't he?
Question B: Which one of these is a Daily Mail front page?
Question C: Which one is the real Independent front page?
Makes you think doesn't it? There you go - why The Guardian didn't go tabloid.
Apologies if you live outside of the UK and that post doesn't make any sense.

The size of the Guardian IS annoying. People who buy the Mail will always buy the Mail though, how much does the front page really influence people?
I liked the fact that yesterday whilst every other paper was running cover Oscar pictures, The Independent's cover was running a story on how banks are robbing us.
It didn't make me buy it though.
Posted by: Claire Gates | Feb 28, 2007 at 10:56
too bad im outside UK... cus i would really apreciate that comparison. Here in portugal we have a newspaper called Publico that was recently redesigned by Mark Porter, art dirctor from the Guardion... and i just dont like it :/ follows most of the things you dont like on the Guardion
Posted by: Freeza | Feb 28, 2007 at 12:41
I'm outside of the UK and it doesn't make much sense to me. Could you please post the answers to those questions? That might help...
Here in the Netherlands a couple of papers went tabloid lately and I think for all papers involved the circulation went up. I do think they look just a little bit less serious/trustworthy now.
Posted by: Maaike | Feb 28, 2007 at 13:00
Question A: Indy
Question B: The one on the right
Question C: Both
What do I win?
Posted by: Richard | Feb 28, 2007 at 13:30
Richard - I reckon the prize ought to be that Innocent book, don't you?
Posted by: davidthedesigner | Feb 28, 2007 at 13:57
I hate few things more than full broadsheet newspapers.
Posted by: Blip | Feb 28, 2007 at 16:19
Yeh David, whatever happened to that?
Posted by: Richard | Feb 28, 2007 at 16:35
No good asking me Richard - get on to Ben about it.
Posted by: davidthedesigner | Feb 28, 2007 at 16:49
I quite like the redesign except for two things:
A. I think the headline is too close to the top banner. I keep wanting to move it down a few millimetres so there's a balance in white space above and below.
B. The sections in the middle are still too big - I usually make sure I but it on Mondays and Tuesdays for the media and education supplements respectively. They are a nightmare to read on a messy desk or on the train, and (as I discovered today while trying to produce some handouts for a lecture on the contribution design can make to education and health) they don't fit on a photocopier being ever so slightly bigger than A3.
Meanwhile the crappy G2 supplement is all nice and manageable.
Posted by: Jonathan | Feb 28, 2007 at 18:20
The problem with all tabloids is that there is not enough news on the front page. And banner headlines overwhelm everything. They are almost threatening. ie You vill digest this story and agree with our take on it before you are allowed to continue.
Posted by: grahamsalmon | Feb 28, 2007 at 21:24
papers are a dying media anyway, so it's all a waste of time and most importantly paper/resources. in the interests of 'sustainability' it's something most of us could live without. it all seems so out dated.
Posted by: free | Feb 28, 2007 at 23:24
Free.. paper is not dying...
Posted by: Freeza | Mar 01, 2007 at 16:07
Richard and David - Yes, yes, yes. I need to think of a quiz question.
Posted by: Ben | Mar 01, 2007 at 22:05
They've even got their own phrase for this at the Guardian.
They would say that berliner was the right size for a paper that didn't want to end up shouting all the time as it allowed for the "the geometry of news"
Posted by: adamc | Mar 06, 2007 at 13:43
One of those covers looks familiar. I remember it because it seemed so f**king funny in context - sitting in the newsagent. There's a picture of it on my blog:
http://www.craigyt.co.uk/archives/2006/09/independent.html
Posted by: Craig Thomas | Mar 06, 2007 at 20:27