Great post by one of the Matts summarising "Adaptive Design". A concept many years old but one that gained a digital prominence in the early 2000s. Well worth reading the full post here. Screws not glue etc.
Might have a go at this "I’d love to for designers to share their ideas for future adaptable iPhones and adaptable apps, expand the discourse, and pushing back on the status quo."
This blog post by George Cave is so good. Best proper blog post I've read in years. I wish I'd written it.
It's not just about Lego, it's about design and interface more broadly. Take this point and the links off to the contrasting Dyson and Audi approach to car interfaces. Dyson - all on one screen. Audi - controls on individual parts.
It's a rabbit warren of wonderfulness like that. Glorious. Read it all The UX of Lego Interface Panels by George Cave.
We rented an AirBnb by the sea the other day. This was the bathroom.
This is not a bathroom designed for someone who uses it every day. This is a bathroom designed to catch your eye in the photos on AirBnb. I expect there's loads of this.
Presumably whole houses are being designed purely for people scrolling through AirBnb.
Anyway.
I don't have the appropriate close up photograph to illustrate this point so you'll have to look at the picture above, take my word for it and use your imagination.
Expectations successfully lowered let's get to the point.
I went for a run the other day and ended up at Speakers Corner. At first I thought it was very quiet. There were quite a few 'speakers' but they only had an audience of 3 or 4. No huge crowds gathered around one brilliant orator like I've seen before and you've seen in the movies.
Speakers Corner in the 70s. Taken from Leonard Bentley's Flickr account.
As I got closer I saw that there were lots of speakers and they all had crowds 3 or 4 but they also all had microphones and cameras on tripod. The tripod was the give away - a proper semi-pro recording set up.
Presumably what they're doing making these speeches for YouTube and just using Speakers Corner as the location. The physical back drop but also for the YouTube title and the SEO. All that. Turn up at the weekend with a few mates, set up the AV kit and make your speech. Why reach hundreds at the real Speakers Corner when you can reach millions at the virtual one. A quick search on YouTube reveals that to be the case. I'm not linking to anything here, you can Google for yourself.
Of course. It's always so obvious isn't it?
A few screengrabs purely to illustrate the point. I'm not endorsing any of the speakers in any way.
In the glory days of Peak Graphic Design Blogging (circa 2009) everyone would have gone crazy for all the arrows you see everywhere these days. Fat ones, thin ones, Mexico 68 ones, ones they did in Word ones. Keyboards burning with all the posting. Oh how incensed everyone would have been!
I guess there's still time. Or maybe they're all on Insta now.
Saw this in a shop window in East the other day. Feels like the language is wrong.
On the one hand it's just a sort of malapropism, where the PayPoint and British Gas should be swapped. But that doesn't work because they're not trying to explain British Gas's payment policies in 6 words. What they're trying to say is if you are a customer of British Gas you can't pay for that at the PayPoint till. But they're also trying to use as few words as possible so it can be a Big Red Sign.
If you tried to pay at the PayPoint til it would be rejected, so in that way PayPoint does not accept British Gas.
But it reads like a protest sign from a march where British Gas has done something terrible. Or maybe British Gas have lost an election to PayPoint and are refusing to leave office.
Or as Russell says in the much better, much longer blog post from 8 years ago in reference to this sign, "on one level it's just a stupid typo, on another it's a brilliant seed for a short story about a sentient restaurant that's trying to stay close to you, and the mystery of the inconvenience it caused. But - most interestingly - it's a story about the meaning created in collaboration, presumably between someone who didn't have English as a first language and Microsoft Word."
Picture taken by Russell, borrowed from his Flickr.
And either way, in both cases, it does not matter. Because you know exactly what they mean.
Haven't blogged for a while, so hello.
After this one the other day, here's another bad chart. Or as Michael puts it, "This is one of the stupidest charts I've ever seen and I can't believe that adult human beings were involved in its creation". His tweet here.
We've been here before, in November 2008 during the "credit crunch". In fact I wrote A LOT of blog posts about it at the time. I even did a whole series of guest posts with advice for designers to help them get through a recession. Included posts from an accountant and an agency CEO.
Yeah, I know. Different times.
Anyway the best thing to read is probably this blog post by Phil - Graphs that lie.
There are lots of charts like this at the moment. I really don't understand the point of the chart.
I mean, yeah, obviously. And yeah, good. Well not good, but appropriate and so good. It's exactly what you'd expect to see, isn't it?
I guess the stark lines are very attractive to editors and, yes, to graphic designers.
Anyway. Not helpful, sorry.
Out for daily exercise I was struck by all the dystopian, Orwellian screens. STAY HOME.
If this had happened 20 years ago, 15 years ago, we didn't have all these screens. I guess there were press ads and posters, but they don't feel as scary. More static, obviously.
The phrase has stuck. STAY HOME. It's simple and fits onto these funny screens well. Same message every time. Very on message we would have said in the old days.
I'm not complaining - it's good. It's necessary. I'm just recording it here for posterity. Timehop.
You've come to expect this sort of behaviour from the BT Tower but it's odd to see this from a theatre and a cinema. Presumably it's not bought media - the National definitely isn't. Will they be used this way in the future? Register to vote? Get out and vote? Queen's birthday? Where's the bar now?
And there's this too. A clever YouTube montage of all the coronavirus ads. It makes its point well. Every brand is saying the same thing. The same message.
I mean, I agree. But what else are they supposed to say? They could say nothing, that's a solid idea. But if they have the media booked anyway and if they sell online then saying 'thank you' and 'hang in there' and 'stay home' is not a bad idea.
Anyway. Stay home.
I'm really struggling with this one. Pret ❤️s London's Homeless.
I think they're giving meals ("7,000 additional meals") to the homeless which is good. But this still feels like an odd thing to say. However much you might love individuals who are homeless, surely you must hate the fact that homelessness exists.
This reads like you love the group and the idea. It's all a bit "Yay homeless!"
Also, if you love homeless people then surely you must want them to not be homeless anymore. So, idk, give them all the sandwiches or start a shelter or something.
Anyway, hashtag brands.
Recent Comments