This year saw several new articles to back up my strategy of "Good design is as little design as possible". Dieter Rams said that, not me.
There's currently a Dieter Rams exhibition on at the Design Museum and accordingly there's a whole raft of interviews on the web, which is a good a time as any to review his 10 design principles. They're all great, but "Good design is as little design as possible" is the one that's closest to my own personal design philosophy.
Often, more design gets in the way. Often, more design doesn't help, it merely adds more problems. The trouble with this philosophy in a job where you get paid to design is that people think you're shirking the working. Or that you're trying to get away with doing very little.
This isn't the case.
As Rory Sutherland (again more eloquently than I) points out, "the problems arising from excessive intervention – because “we must be seen to do something” – outweigh the benefits." In July he wrote a brilliant article about the perils of intervening because you have to justify your existence. And in the way only Rory Sutherland can he cited the examples of the many people with personal physicians who die young.
"I can imagine what it must be like to be a personal physician. Every day you must feel you have to do something to justify your existence. Yet, in truth, most of the time people are better off being medically left alone most of the time. And most illnesses may be best treated with rest and a little warmth."
It's a brilliant article, well worth a read.
To further elaborate on my point eloquently read this article by Michael Bierut. As I pointed out earlier in the year he lists several pointers to being a successful designer. Here are the first three.
1. Keep it simple.
2. Don’t reinvent the wheel [Part 1].
3. Don’t reinvent the wheel [Part 2].
Can you see a pattern building?
Good design is as little design as possible. The problems arising from excessive intervention outweigh the benefits. Keep it simple. Don’t reinvent the wheel
Very eloquent.
Good points all around. I can especially identify with the issue of appearing you are "shirking" when in reality it takes a lot more skill to create a simple and accurate solution than it does to come up with confusing and convoluted fluff.
Nice article.
Posted by: Avery Smith | Dec 21, 2009 at 21:44
I've always felt that Rams' maxim isn't quite correct, it puts emphasis in the wrong place.
It shouldn't be "as little as possible", it should be "as much as is necessary".
i.e. you keep going until it's right. You don't wait for it to be finished.
no disrespect to Mr. Rams of course, i hold is work in very high regard.
Posted by: Matt Cooper | Dec 22, 2009 at 11:33