We're handing back the city to people Pedestrianisation, cycling a good thing I'd be surprised if the car lasted 20 years (This is an interesting thought, we're getting used to seeing sectors completely transformed in about 10 years - Blockbuster to Netflix. It's not crazy to think the same could happen to the car.)
The Garden City is a bad "utopia" 1850 average age was 17
I'm worried about weakening of the city when we take the life out of the city
It's too late not be seriously damaged by climate change. But I think there's a good chance we won't destroy mankind.
(His phone rings. It's an iPhone.)
The big five house builders are in the business of profit Better for them to build 100 houses and make a big profit than build 1000 houses and make a much smaller profit
We've never built fewer houses than since 1922
Sadie Khan is interested in affordable housing (says he's been talking with him) The production system is controlled by private interests which is not the same as the interest that wants to build more housing
2000 citizens in Athens when it started and the motto was - "I promise to leave the city better than when I entered it"
(There are maybe 60 people here, it really does feel like an intimate chat.)
Trafalgar square was the biggest roundabout in Europe before
At a simple level buildings have to meet their users needs and then be beautiful to be uplifting
Notting Hill Gate is very high density Height is not necessarily essential for high density
Highest density in Europe is Barcelona and has nothing over 8 stories (bar one or two) It's had 3 brilliant mayors
The walk along the canal from the Olympics to Camden is fantastic
There is no excuse not to build the right number of houses we have the technology
(Someone asked about Brexit. Massive sigh from Rogers. Head in hands.) I'm scared. It's amazing that we're so parochial to think the nation is a thing. The big problems facing us like climate change won't be solved by individual nations.
I'm a big fan of cities. Nations are only useful for sports.
Ordering one is easy enough, it costs £4.99 which gets deducted off your first purchase.
I chose Andrex as that’s the only brand I could us using in this household. We don’t really buy the other brands listed.
Setting it up isn’t as simple as I’d expected. Takes a few goes, lots of bluetooth syncing issues. Many other tech things have this issue, but it felt like a big overhead for some toilet rolls.
You can choose which Andrex product you’d like from a small range. In common with Prime Now and Add Ons and other speedy Amazon services it seems like there’s a minimum spend of around £15. That’s a lot of toilet rolls.
I pressed it late Thursday night and on Saturday morning 45 toilet rolls turned up.
A completely customisable one would be incredible. Presumably that will come.
It looks awful. Looks ok in the photos, but it’s bigger than you think and there would be no way I’d want this in my bathroom stuck on the wall. The logos are just too ugly. That’s an odd thing to write when bathrooms are notoriously filled with ugly logos and I could conceivably change my mind with subtler logos. This isn’t just a designer’s comment. It feels weird.
The experience is strangely cold. And I'm an easily excitable early adopter type.
Two points here:
1. I press a button and 24 hours later the thing I want arrives on my door. It knows exactly which one I want, it knows my address and it debits my account. That is an incredible experience.
2. Nothing really happens when you press the button. A little green dot flashes. 24 hours is a long time to wait for something to happen after you’ve pressed a button. It’s all a bit of an anti-climax.
This raises all sorts of awkward questions for brands and “customer experience” people. The worst thing Amazon could do would be to layer on lots of meaningless jokes and ideas. An app you had to fire up that had an animation of Andrex puppy loading a lorry would be an awful idea - for example. But you can imagine the temptation.
The experience is brilliant, really. Maybe the button needs to make a noise. Maybe we’ll just get used to it. I am not advocating more "brand experience". Far from it. Please don't write a think piece claiming I think Amazon needs more "brand experience". I don't.
Maybe it's just feels odd because it's a new behaviour. I could imagine a dozen of these in a garage, or maybe an airing cupboard and on Sunday afternoon you go round pressing them as required.
It feels like it would be more magical if they played with the economics, and there is much more eloquent writing on the economics, innovation and marketing impacts of this from Simon Wardley and Matt Webb. This is a snowflake on an iceberg controlled by Amazon.
And remember, “in the future every product will carry a buy button."
One last thing. Whether you love this or hate this, the point is that Amazon is a company that can make this happen and almost no one else can right now.
I did my first Parkrun on Saturday. 5 sunny kilometres around Dulwich Park.
I loved it. Great atmosphere. Good fun.
Parkrun is a phenomenon there are about 150,000 runners every Saturday all across the globe. There were about 200 people in Dulwich.
This is old news but it’s a real internet enabled, ground up community. It’s free, you can register online and then you get a printed barcode and therefore a time, but you don’t have to, you could just turn up and run. Staffed by volunteers.
The rules or operating principles to setting one up seem to be: Saturday 9am, 5k, in a park. That's pretty simple.
It's a lot less intimidating than joining a running club. A bit like blogging used to be "networking for shy people" you could see how this could be a running club for shy people. It's more diverse than a running club too, a variety of ages and speeds. Not massively diverse, but that might just be the park I was in.
Using the network to good effect. Creating shared online and offline platforms.